Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3172 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3340M - 160 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
