Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1521 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3340M - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£275
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £275 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |