Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 699 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 17 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 0% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-3317U - 297 vs 296 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
297
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |