Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Core i5-2537M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 253 days newer than Core i5-2537M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2537M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2537M - 110 vs 109 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2537M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2537M | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
