Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-2500K - 212 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - £37.72 vs £158.18
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £158.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 634 minutes ago
Buy for £37.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
28.209606986899566%
Multi-Core
1921
17.878082829222894%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |