Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 200% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-6350 - 150 vs 50 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - £49.99 vs £203.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-13400 - £1.0 vs £1.35 per FPS
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £203 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |