Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 31% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 694 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - £0.29 vs £0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - £163.75 vs £202.05
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
694
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£202.05
81%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £202.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18956 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
529
76%
Value, £/FPS
£0.31/FPS
93%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18957 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |