Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4771 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4771.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4771 - 192 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-4771 - £197.13 vs £201.85
- Up to 13% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4771 - £1.03 vs £1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4771 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4771 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4771
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.03/FPS
100%
Price, £
£197.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £197.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1878 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
169
88.02083333333334%
Value, £/FPS
£1.19/FPS
86.5546218487395%
Price, £
£201.85
97%
Buy for £201.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1879 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1193
56.2205466540999%
Multi-Core
3857
47.10552027357108%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i7-4771 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |