Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 13% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400F - 634 vs 562 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - £101.31 vs £135.99
- Up to 14% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-11500 - £0.18 vs £0.21 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
634
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
85%
Price, £
£135.99
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for £135.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
562
88%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |