Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i5-450M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3880 days newer than Core i5-450M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Core i5-450M - 155 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-450M - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-450M doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-450M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Core i5-450M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Core i5-450M |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 26th, 2010 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Arrandale |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket G1 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
