Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3081 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G1610 - 547 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
