Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2934 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than FX-6350 - 186 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |