Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - £119.95 vs £346.89
- Up to 62% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-13700K - £0.67 vs £1.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10600KF - 196 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17164 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.77/FPS
37%
Price, £
£346.89
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for £346.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |