Buy on Amazon
£119.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-10105F - 246 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - £69.8 vs £119.95
- Up to 41% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10600KF - £0.29 vs £0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.49/FPS
59%
Price, £
£119.95
58%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for £119.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16010 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
243
98%
Value, £/FPS
£0.29/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.8
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10th Generation - Desktop processor (3.7 GHz Tuboboost: 4.4 GHz, 4 cores, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for £69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
