Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - £168.88 vs £237.38
- Up to 22% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-11900F - £1.28 vs £1.64 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-10600 - 145 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
91%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£168.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19542 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
78%
Price, £
£237.38
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for £237.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |