Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3363 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5690 - 107 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.92/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Xeon X5690 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |