Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 36% better in Starfield than Core i5-10400F - 80 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
52.67399267399268%
Multi-Core
5751
33.39915209942505%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |