Buy on Amazon
£122.49
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-10400 - 732 vs 561 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.3 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £122.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1430
52.38095238095239%
Multi-Core
5489
31.877577095069398%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i9-13900F or Core i5-10400
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
536 FPS
£3.88/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070
Core i9-13900F
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£2,080
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
