Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-10210U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 253 days newer than Core i5-10210U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10210U - 159 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10210U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10210U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.62/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-10210U |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 21st, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 15 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 16.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |