Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 298 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3200G - 182 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£98.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £98.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |