Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 234 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-9100T - 109 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
109
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£328.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £328.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2435 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
77.6630083925113%
Multi-Core
3178
50.79923273657288%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |