Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 455 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £247.07 vs £328.66
- Up to 25% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-9700F - £1.61 vs £2.15 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.15/FPS
74.88372093023257%
Price, £
£328.66
75%
Buy for £328.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
153
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£247.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £247.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |