Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1253 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £120.0 vs £495.49
- Up to 75% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-13900K - £0.65 vs £2.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Core i3-9100F - 190 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
184
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.61/FPS
24%
Price, £
£495.49
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £495.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |