Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 455 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £108.88 vs £183.9
- Up to 39% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £0.86 vs £1.4 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-9100F - 131 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
127
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9215 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
61%
Price, £
£183.9
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for £183.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |