Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4350 - 204 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £59.97 vs £120.0
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74462 minutes ago
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |