Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Core i3-8109U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1076 days newer than Core i3-8109U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-8109U - 121 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£237.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £237.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |