Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2364 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4100 - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
