Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i3-7300T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1213 days newer than Core i3-7300T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-7300T - 183 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300T - 20 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1108
62.847419171866136%
Multi-Core
2363
25.81385186803583%
Intel Core i3-7300T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |