Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 98 days older than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 5 1600X - 408 vs 401 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 254 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |