Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1302 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9590 - 126 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
