Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1703 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Core i3-6300 - 231 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
231
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
71.58252977878617%
Multi-Core
2539
27.73650863010706%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |