Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1995 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Xeon X5650 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Xeon X5650 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon |
| Skylake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
