Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1251 days newer than Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 73 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-530 - 116 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-530 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
116
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-530 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |