Buy on Amazon
£35.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1013 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6100 - 131 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 6 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 CPU Used 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop Processor 3.3 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
