Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1197 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-4150 - 259 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 24 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
88.67120954003407%
Multi-Core
2047
29.343463302752294%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |