Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2433 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4130 - 134 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
