Buy on Amazon
£246.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2057
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2057
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 160 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£246.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £246.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
