Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-760 is 175 days older than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Core i3-390M - 44 vs 42 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
44
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£199.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £199.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |