Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1579 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3250 - 191 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
33.6283185840708%
Multi-Core
1130
17.538413782399502%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |