Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2706 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 58% better in Starfield than Core i3-3250 - 71 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £132.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
24.426078971533517%
Multi-Core
1130
11.010425801422585%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |