Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1583 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 22% better in Rust than Core i3-3240T - 188 vs 154 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
35.84603047313553%
Multi-Core
971
39.795081967213115%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |