Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3648 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 33% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3227U - 289 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-3227U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 17 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
