Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2296 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3227U - 131 vs 112 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |