Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2423 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £9.84 vs £346.0
- Up to 97% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-9700F - £0.05 vs £1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3225 - 207 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3225 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £9.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for £346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3225 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |