Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2592 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 49% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3217U - 199 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
199
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£73.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £73.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |