Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 332 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 5% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-3217U - 107 vs 102 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
107
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.56/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |