Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2696 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than Core i3-3110M - 724 vs 594 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 20 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
724
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£570
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |