Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2161 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-2350M - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |