Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1073 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-2350M - 160 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |