Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 14% better in Rocket League than FX-6100 - 765 vs 670 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - £35.24 vs £113.41
- Up to 67% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i3-13100F - £0.05 vs £0.15 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
765
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
33%
Price, £
£113.41
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £113.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 545 minutes ago
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |